Putting a few obstacles in its way may well boost its creativity. Some people think it's a good idea to challenge our working environment with deliberate invonvenience. Why isn't the idea of "ease of use" such a good thing?
Why would anyone make their work more difficult than it already is? Our brains respond better to difficulty than we imagine.
Desireable difficulties are not such a bad thing at all. Sometimes it's only when difficulty is removed that we realize what it was doing for us. Numerous studies have now found that when classroom material is made harder to absorb, pupils retain more of it over the long term, and understand it on a deeper level
You might think that any tool which enables a writer to get words on a page would be an advantage. But there may be a cost to such facility.
We might produce a better a better result while meeting a terrible resistance. Think about it. You have to face the first years of your life when you tried to get over your very first writers block.
What was it, when you couldn't write at all? Did you ever think about the tension of the first time compared to when your writing became a little bit more fluent?
Remove the resistance and you're likely to produce a much better result.
Some researchers think that handwriting does activate more of the brain than beyboard writing, including areas responsible for thinking and memory.
Comments